Numerous governors, defying constitutional mandates, have neglected to provide financial autonomy to the legislative arm of government in their respective states, with only Lagos, Delta, Plateau, Oyo, and Nasarawa currently achieving a semblance of complete independence for their Houses of Assembly.

Meanwhile, an additional twelve states, including Adamawa, Akwa Ibom, Benue, Borno, Cross River, Enugu, Kogi, Kwara, Bauchi, Ogun, Osun, and Rivers, have partially granted autonomy to their legislative arms. However, there is still a category of states that has not extended any form of financial autonomy to their legislative assemblies.

This category encompasses Ondo, Katsina, Gombe, Taraba, Yobe, Ekiti, Abia, and Imo, along with Bayelsa, Anambra, Ebonyi, Niger, Bauchi, Kebbi, Sokoto, Zamfara, Kano, Jigawa, and Kaduna.

Recent events led to members of the Parliamentary Staff Association of Nigeria (PASAN) initiating a nationwide industrial action in around 20 states. This strike was triggered by the failure to implement financial autonomy for state assemblies in the country.

Gbenga Oluwajuyigbe, the Chairman of PASAN in Ekiti State, stressed that financial autonomy applies to both the National and State Assemblies. While the National Assembly has enjoyed full autonomy for the past decade due to their funds being designated as a first-line charge, the situation differs at the state level.

Oluwajuyigbe explained that compliance with autonomy can be categorized into three levels: partial implementation, full implementation, and non-compliance.

Full financial autonomy, as outlined in Section 121 of the 1999 Constitution, is achieved when legislative allocations are designated as a first-line charge. Partial implementation refers to a scenario where executive authorities still handle the payment of legislative salaries.

Oluwajuyigbe asserted, “There is a provision in the 1999 Constitution, as amended in Section 121, which grants financial independence to the legislature. All we are advocating for is the government’s adherence to this constitutional provision. When we refer to non-implementation of the autonomy clause, it indicates that they have not initiated any form of implementation of Section 121. In such cases, the State Assembly must still seek the governor’s approval for funding for nearly everything.”

He added, “We can classify Ekiti as partially implemented because salaries are not paid within the state assembly but are still controlled by the Accountant General. Until they have their own pay point, similar to the National Assembly, it remains a partial implementation.”

Usman Mohammed, the National President of PASAN, confirmed that Lagos and Plateau already enjoy autonomy, with Jigawa gradually moving in the same direction.

He emphasized, “The Constitution does not permit partial implementation; it has granted autonomy to the state legislature under Section 121. It dictates that the entire funds meant for the state legislature and the Judiciary should be transferred to their accounts. It does not specify transferring only the overhead, personnel costs, or capital; it includes all the funds.”